Market value, not your business plan
The instruction and valuation basis matter. The valuer is not simply confirming the contract price, build cost or amount you want to borrow.
A commercial valuation is not just a bigger version of a house valuation. The valuer may analyse rent, vacancy, lease terms, operating costs, comparable sales, market yield, building condition and alternative use.
APRA requires regulated banks to assess repayment capacity and not use collateral as a substitute. The valuation is still critical because it helps the lender understand the value, marketability and risks of the property security.
The instruction and valuation basis matter. The valuer is not simply confirming the contract price, build cost or amount you want to borrow.
The valuer provides an opinion under the instruction; the lender separately applies credit policy, LVR, serviceability and legal requirements.
Market conditions, lease events, property condition and new information can change value later.
Depending on the property, the valuer may consider comparable sales, income capitalisation, discounted cash flow or cost evidence.
A commercial valuation can be sensitive to details that do not matter in a typical house valuation.
| Area | Examples of evidence | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Lease and income | Lease, options, reviews, incentives, arrears, rent schedule, outgoings | Supports sustainable net income and lease risk analysis |
| Property | Area, use, zoning, access, services, condition, fit-out and capital works | Affects utility, alternative use and buyer demand |
| Market | Comparable sales and leasing, vacancy, yields, supply and demand | Supports the adopted market assumptions |
| Tenant / operator | Credit quality, concentration, related party, licences and operating dependence | Can affect income durability and marketability |
| Environmental / compliance | Contamination, cladding, fire, approvals, heritage and building issues | Can create cost, delay, insurance or saleability risk |
| Transaction | Contract, GST treatment, related parties and unusual conditions | Helps the valuer understand whether the sale is normal market evidence |
This example shows why valuation discussions should include both sustainable net income and market yield evidence.
This is an educational capitalisation example, not a valuation. It shows why small changes to net income or the market capitalisation rate can move an income-based value.
A qualified valuer may use more than one method and will analyse market evidence, lease terms, property condition and other factors.
A valuer may reconcile more than one approach rather than rely on a single formula.
Recent relevant sales are adjusted for differences such as location, size, lease, condition and use.
Sustainable net income is capitalised using a market-supported rate. Small changes to income or rate can materially move value.
Future income, vacancy, leasing costs, capital expenditure and sale value are modelled over time and discounted.
Land and improvements may be considered, allowing for depreciation and obsolescence. Cost does not automatically equal market value.
A useful response addresses evidence, assumptions or the transaction structure rather than simply saying the contract proves the value.
Check the adopted rent, vacancy, outgoings, areas, lease details, capitalisation rate, condition and property description.
Provide documents for any genuine error in area, lease, tenant, improvements, approvals or comparable evidence.
The lender controls the instruction and review. A borrower usually cannot direct the valuer independently.
Possible responses include more equity, a smaller loan, different lender, price renegotiation, extra security or postponing until risk is resolved.
For some assets, value depends heavily on licences, approvals, fit-out, management, occupancy and a limited buyer pool. The valuer may consider alternative use and the cost of conversion.
Market depth, location, access, building condition, lease quality and alternative use normally matter. A conventional property can still be difficult if it is vacant, poorly located or highly altered.
Fit-out, licences or approvals, operator capability, local demand and the cost of changing the property to another use can affect both cash flow and value.
The property and operating business may be closely connected. Management, occupancy, seasonality, licences, staffing and capital works can become central to the credit decision.
Design certification, enrolment or registration, provider arrangements, participant demand, vacancy and alternative-use value need to be separated rather than treated as one guaranteed income stream.
Stabilised occupancy, ramp-up assumptions, pricing, operating costs, development stages, presales and management systems can matter more than a single headline rent or forecast.
Lease quality, site history, contamination risk, environmental reports, remediation exposure and future marketability can affect valuation, leverage and lender appetite.
Provide complete, consistent documents before the inspection or desktop assessment.
A broker can help organise the valuation pack and query process, but cannot control the valuation outcome.
The valuer may adopt different income, market yield, comparable evidence, property risk or value assumptions. The contract is evidence, not an automatic valuation.
The lender usually orders the valuation from its panel or approved process to preserve independence.
It can be useful background, but the lender may require a new report under its own instruction and panel.
There is no universal period. The lender decides whether a report is current enough for the transaction and market.
A property valuation may not include goodwill, stock or the operating business unless specifically instructed. Separate the property and business components.
It is a market-derived rate used to convert sustainable net income into an income-based value. A higher rate generally produces a lower value.
The valuer may assess market rent, leasing time, incentives, holding costs and alternative use rather than relying on an existing lease.
Factual errors or material overlooked evidence can be submitted through the lender’s review process. A different opinion alone may not be enough.
Each page owns one topic, while the pillar, calculator and guide bring the whole transaction together.
These sources support the general regulatory, valuation, tax or consumer-protection context. They do not provide lender-specific approval rules. Links checked August 2026.
Rate Challenge can review the borrower, property, lease or business cash flow, valuation, evidence, costs and loan structure together. A specific lender outcome is only available after the full scenario is assessed.
General information only. This page does not provide legal, tax, valuation or financial advice; quote a lender’s current policy; assess eligibility; or promise approval. Lender policy, pricing and documentation can change. Confirm the transaction with the relevant lender, broker, lawyer, accountant, valuer, conveyancer and government authority before acting.
Start with the question you are trying to solve. Do not upload or send sensitive records through this initial form.